Invest in India: choosing a holding company jurisdiction — UAE, Singapore, Netherlands, UK or US?

Short answer: For most UK and European groups, the best way to hold an Indian subsidiary is directly, because they already receive India's 10% treaty rate on dividends; a holding company in the UAE, Singapore or the Netherlands is worth adding only where it brings a specific benefit that real substance can defend. When you invest in India through a company, India withholds 20% plus surcharge and cess on dividends unless a treaty applies (10% for the UAE, Singapore, Netherlands and UK; 15% for the US), and taxes a long-term gain on unlisted shares at 12.5% plus surcharge and cess. An intermediate holdco therefore pays only through exit treatment (the Netherlands alone generally blocks India's share-sale tax), service fees (the UAE treaty has no technical-fees article), home-level tax or, for UAE-owned groups, treaty protection (only the UAE has a BIT in force with India, and it denies its benefits to a holdco owned or controlled from outside the UAE). Each advantage needs real substance after the Supreme Court's 2026 Tiger Global ruling.

Who this is for: CFOs, group tax heads and general counsel of UK, US and European groups deciding where their India investment should sit before they fund it.

Why the holding jurisdiction is the first decision when you invest in India

The entity that owns the Indian shares fixes four things for the life of your foreign direct investment in India:

1. what India withholds on dividends, interest, royalties and service fees;
2. what India taxes on exit, whether you sell the Indian company or the holdco;
3. whether the principal purpose test (PPT), India's general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) or a conduit challenge can deny treaty relief;
4. what protects the investment if the Indian state acts against it.

Changing the holding company later usually means a taxable transfer of the Indian shares.

Two treaties are in play, doing different jobs. The tax treaty (DTAA) sets what India takes from each payment and from the exit. The investment treaty (BIT), where one exists, sets your recourse if the Indian state acts against the investment. A jurisdiction can be strong on one and weak on the other, so weigh both; protection does not follow from a good tax rate.

What India taxes whichever route you choose

The Income-tax Act 2025 replaced the 1961 Act from 1 April 2026. Existing treaties continue under the section 536(2)(j) savings clause, with section 159 as the operative relief provision [1][2][3].

To claim a treaty rate, the shareholder needs a tax residency certificate (TRC) and Form 41 (formerly Form 10F). It must be the beneficial owner and pass the PPT and any limitation-of-benefits (LOB) clause [2][8]. India adds no surcharge or cess to a treaty rate [5]. See Form 10F (now Form 41) and tax residency certificate.

India holding company DTAA rates compared: UAE, Singapore, Netherlands, UK, US

Sources: [5], [9]–[15], [37], [38]; every treaty rate above matches the Income Tax Department's DTAA rate grid [37]. After Nestle (Supreme Court, 2023), Dutch shareholders cannot use the most-favoured-nation clause to reach 5% [15].

The point most comparisons miss: a UK or European parent holding directly already gets 10% on dividends, so an intermediate holdco saves it no dividend tax (see UK–India double tax treaty: guide for UK companies). US groups start from 15%.

Exit by selling the holdco: India's indirect-transfer rule

Selling the holdco instead of the Indian shares does not escape India. Under section 9(10), a gain on foreign shares is taxable in India where Indian assets exceed INR 10 crore and form at least 50% of total assets; a seller that held 5% or less, without management or control, in the preceding twelve months is excluded [3][39]. The buyer must withhold unless a nil or lower withholding certificate (Form 128, s.395) is obtained [40]. Treaty cover then depends on the seller's treaty. A UK or US parent selling a Dutch holdco falls under its own treaty, which leaves the gain to Indian law. The Dutch exemption protects a sale by the Dutch company, not a sale of it. Tiger Global was itself an indirect transfer [16].

Service and management fees: where the UAE treaty differs

India withholds 20% (plus surcharge and cess) on technical fees; the UK, US, Singapore and Netherlands treaties cap this at 10%–15%. The UAE treaty has no FTS article, so such fees are business profits, taxable in India only through a permanent establishment [9][37]. This works only if people in the UAE genuinely perform the services, at arm's-length prices that pass the PPT. See Permanent establishment in India (employees, EOR, agents) and India withholding tax rates 2026 and how to repatriate profits.

Tax at the holding-company level

Sources: [17]–[22].

Principal purpose test, GAAR and substance after Tiger Global

In Tiger Global (15 January 2026) the Supreme Court held that a TRC is necessary but not conclusive: India can deny relief where control sits elsewhere [16][23][55] (see the substance arc from Azadi Bachao to Tiger Global). Two weeks later, in Hareon Solar Singapore (Delhi Tribunal), a Singapore holdco that met the SGD 200,000 expenditure test still lost relief. It had no staff, no office, and decisions taken by non-resident directors [16]. The PPT has applied to the UAE, Singapore, Netherlands and UK treaties since 1 April 2020 [24]. The test is not an Indian peculiarity: the PPT is one of the three ways a country can meet the OECD/G20 minimum standard against treaty shopping under BEPS Action 6 [52], and it reached these four treaties through the Multilateral Instrument (MLI) rather than bilateral renegotiation [9][11][12][24]. GAAR overrides treaties, though CBDT Notifications 54 and 55 of 2026 exclude income from transferring pre-April 2017 investments [25].

Substance means evidence of:

• decisions: board meetings held, and minutes signed, in the holding state
• people: resident directors who understand the Indian business and decide
• money: a local bank mandate and genuine operating spend
• purpose: a documented commercial reason beyond the treaty rate

India BIT coverage: who still has an investment treaty with India?

India terminated most of its bilateral investment treaties (BITs) in 2016–17 [26][27].

[26][28][29][41][42][43][51][57]. For a general counsel this is often the clearest difference. Article 36.1 of the India–UAE BIT denies the treaty's benefits to an investor owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by persons of a non-Party; read literally, a UAE holding company owned by a UK, US or European group is excluded whatever its substance, although no tribunal has yet ruled on the clause [57]. The UAE treaty therefore realistically protects UAE-owned and UAE-controlled investors; a Western group investing now relies on contract design (seat, a state counterparty or sovereign guarantee, immunity waivers), political-risk insurance or a home-state investment guarantee, and, for investments made before termination, legacy cover under the terminated BITs. The list also moves: the India–Israel BIT entered into force on 4 July 2026, and a revised Model BIT, expected to unblock the stalled UK and EU talks, awaits Cabinet approval [53][54]. Confirm the live position for your holding state at entry rather than relying on a route's history. Treaties on India's 2015 Model BIT, the UAE's included, exclude tax measures and require years of Indian litigation before arbitration (three under the UAE treaty), so a tax dispute will generally not reach a treaty tribunal [28]. Allocate change-in-law and tax risk in the transaction documents instead: tax indemnities, change-in-law clauses and price. Treaty arbitration is slow and costly enough to be realistic mainly for larger investments; for smaller ones, the contract is the main protection.

For the treaty-by-treaty position, see India bilateral investment treaty protection: how to secure your investment before a dispute (ATB Legal).

FEMA and Press Note 3: screen the holdco's shareholders

Press Note 2 (2026 Series) replaced the Press Note 3 (2020) test with effect from the FEMA (Non-Debt Instruments) Amendment Rules 2026 (S.O. 2174(E), notified 1 May 2026, published 2 May 2026) [30][31][44]. Government approval is needed where the investor or its beneficial owner is from a land-border country, tested under the money-laundering rules (PML Rules, rule 9(3)(a), as amended in March 2023): more than 10% of the shares, capital or profits of a company, or control, with look-through of every intermediate entity [45]. Chinese money upstream of a Singapore or UAE holdco can pull the whole investment into the approval route, and DPIIT has said that entities registered in Hong Kong stay on the government route like mainland ones; Hong Kong supplied 13 of the 63 government-route approvals in FY2025-26, the mainland one [46]. A 60-day decision track for land-border stakes of up to 49% in specified manufacturing sectors, with resident Indians in majority control, sits in DPIIT's standard operating procedure of 4 May 2026, not in Press Note 2 itself [34]. Indian co-investors in the holdco also raise overseas-investment layering (no more than two layers of subsidiaries where the foreign entity invests back into India, OI Rules rule 19(3)) and place-of-effective-management questions [49]. FEMA pricing also shapes the exit: when the holdco sells unlisted Indian shares to an Indian resident, the price cannot exceed a fair value certified by a chartered accountant, SEBI-registered merchant banker or practising cost accountant (Non-Debt Instruments Rules, Rule 21(2)(c)), while a sale to another non-resident carries no FEMA pricing condition (Rule 9(1)) [56].

Jurisdictions left out, and GIFT City

Cayman and BVI have no tax treaty with India. Mauritius is a legacy route. Most Luxembourg, Irish, German, French and Swiss parents hold directly under their own treaty; see our corridor pages. GIFT City is not a treaty alternative, because an IFSC unit is an Indian resident, but with a 100% deduction for 20 of 25 tax years (s.147, widened by the Finance Act 2026) and 10% withholding on the dividends it pays abroad (s.207), it can suit fund and treasury vehicles [37][47].

Decision matrix

The decision rule. The right holding jurisdiction passes four tests at once; winning on a single line is not enough:

1. Substance: you can place real decisions, people and activity there.
2. Tax treaty: a favourable DTAA position that your substance can defend.
3. Investment treaty: whatever live BIT cover exists, understood for its limits.
4. Commercial fit: banking, regulation, operating model and the wider group.

Work in that order: start from where you can credibly place substance, then test the treaties for those candidates. Record the commercial rationale at entry, because it is part of the evidence that defends the position later.

*Top surcharge band (gains above INR 10 crore). UAE-linked groups trading goods can also use the India–UAE CEPA, in force since 1 May 2022 [32].

Worked example (illustrative)

Hypothetical. FX: INR 127 = GBP 1, INR 96 = USD 1, INR 107 = EUR 1 (FBIL reference rates, 12 October 2026, rounded) [50]. A UK group invests INR 460 crore (about GBP 36m) in a wholly owned Indian subsidiary.

Year-3 dividend. Profit before tax INR 100 crore − 25.168% tax = PAT INR 74.832 crore, all distributed.

A failed treaty claim costs 16.343 − 7.483 = INR 8.86 crore a year (about GBP 0.70m). For this UK parent a holdco saves nothing on dividends.

Year-5 exit. Sale for INR 760 crore; gain 760 − 460 = INR 300 crore.

• UK direct, UAE or Singapore holdco: 300 × 13.65% = INR 40.95 crore (about GBP 3.22m)
• Dutch holdco selling the Indian shares to a non-Indian buyer: nil, if the PPT is met
• UK parent selling the Dutch holdco instead: taxable under the indirect-transfer rule

Scale test for a US parent. A 10% holdco saves 5 points: 74.832 × 5% = INR 3.742 crore a year (about USD 0.39m). At PAT of INR 5 crore the saving is INR 0.25 crore (about USD 26,000), roughly the annual cost of a properly run UAE holdco. Small investments often do better held directly; see US–India tax treaty: guide for US companies.

Risks and common mistakes, ranked

1. Treaty-only holdcos: PPT or conduit failure (as in Hareon Solar), 21.84% withholding, taxed exit.
2. Assuming a holdco sale escapes India: the indirect-transfer rule applies.
3. Treating the Dutch exit exemption as automatic: it depends on the PPT, the buyer, and unsettled Tribunal law on intra-group buy-backs [33].
4. Pricing a promoter buy-back as a 13.65% exit.
5. Land-border money upstream: government approval for the whole investment.
6. Missing Form 41: withholding at the domestic rate [8].

Checklist to forward internally

• Commercial reason for the holding entity, written without mentioning tax
• Treaty rates for dividends, interest, royalties, fees and exit, compared with holding directly
• Exit modelled both ways: sale of Indian shares and sale of the holdco
• Substance plan: resident directors, board calendar, bank mandate, office, budget
• TRC and Form 41 owner for each tax year
• Cap table, including upstream funds, screened under Press Note 2 (2026)
• Home-level tax and Pillar Two confirmed locally
• BIT eligibility of the actual owner (the UAE treaty excludes holdcos owned or controlled from outside the UAE) and dispute forum recorded for the board

How ATB Corporate can help

ATB Corporate advises companies and investors on entering, structuring and operating in India and the UAE: choosing the entry route and holding structure, tax and exchange-control planning, regulatory compliance, and setting up and running the local business. To discuss your plans, contact ATB Corporate.

FAQ

Which country is best for a holding company to invest in India?

For most UK and European companies, holding the Indian subsidiary directly is the best starting point, because they already receive India's 10% treaty rate on dividends. No jurisdiction wins in every case; an intermediate holding company earns its place only with real substance: the UAE adds nil withholding on technical fees without a permanent establishment and nil home tax (its bilateral investment treaty excludes holding companies owned or controlled from outside the UAE), while the Netherlands can remove India's tax on a sale of the Indian shares to a non-Indian buyer. US groups start from 15%.

How do I invest in India from the UK or US: directly or through a holding company?

UK and US companies can invest in India directly, which is lawful and often the simplest route, or through a holding company, which must earn its cost through benefits that survive the principal purpose test (PPT). A UK parent holding directly already receives India's 10% treaty rate on dividends. A US parent starts from 15%, so a 10% holdco saves it five points, but small investments often do better held directly once the holdco's running cost is counted.

Is a Mauritius holding company still worth using for India?

A Mauritius holding company is rarely worth using for new investment in India. India taxes gains on Indian shares acquired from April 2017, and the 2024 protocol adding a principal purpose test is either in force (from 10 August 2026) or awaiting completion of ratification and notification between the two states, depending on the source. Mauritius is now mainly a legacy route.

Does a UAE holding company get the 10% India–UAE DTAA dividend rate?

Yes, a UAE holding company can get India's 10% dividend rate under the India–UAE DTAA if it is managed and controlled wholly in the UAE, is the beneficial owner, passes the principal purpose test and provides a tax residency certificate (TRC) with Form 41. Without these, India withholds at up to 21.84%. Since Tiger Global, a TRC is necessary but not conclusive, so decisions, people and spending must genuinely sit in the UAE.

What is India's dividend withholding tax for a foreign parent?

India's dividend withholding tax for a foreign parent company is 20.8%–21.84% under domestic law (20% plus surcharge and cess). Under the DTAA it falls to 10% for parents in the UAE, Singapore (holding at least 25%), the Netherlands and the UK, and to 15% for a US parent holding at least 10% of the voting stock. India adds no surcharge or cess to a treaty rate, but the parent must provide a TRC and Form 41.

Can India tax the sale of my Indian subsidiary, or of the holdco above it?

Yes, India can generally tax the sale of an Indian subsidiary, at 13.0%–13.65% on unlisted shares held over 24 months, and its indirect-transfer rule also catches a sale of the offshore holdco where Indian assets exceed INR 10 crore and form at least 50% of its total assets. The main exception is a Dutch holdco selling the Indian shares to a non-Indian buyer, if the PPT is met; a sale of the Dutch holdco itself falls within the indirect-transfer rule.

Does a bilateral investment treaty protect my investment in India?

Of the UAE, Singapore, the Netherlands, the UK and the US, only the UAE has a bilateral investment treaty (BIT) in force with India, and it excludes tax measures and requires three years of local remedies first. Its Article 36.1 also denies the treaty's benefits to an investor owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by persons of a non-Party, so, read literally, a UAE holding company owned by a UK, US or European group is excluded whatever its substance, although no tribunal has yet ruled on the clause. Singapore investors have investor–state arbitration under the CECA. UK and Dutch investors have treaty cover only for investments made before termination, to March 2032 and December 2031 respectively, and US investors have none; for new money, contract terms, political-risk insurance or a home-state investment guarantee do the work.

Related reading

• India corporate tax rate for foreign companies: subsidiary vs branch vs PE
• Singapore vs UAE: where to hold your India investment
• Holding India from Singapore: treaty, substance and structure
• India–UAE business structuring
• India structuring
• FEMA advisory
• Deutsche Telekom v India: what a 15-year dispute teaches investors
• Netherlands–India corridor
• FDI in India: rules, routes and approvals (2026) (ATB Legal)
• Joint venture in India or acquisition: deal structure and shareholder protections (ATB Legal)

Sources

1. CBDT press release, "Income-tax Act 2025 comes into force from 01 April 2026" — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/documents/d/guest/press-release-income-tax-act-2025-comes-into-force-from-01-april-2026-pdf (1 Apr 2026)
2. Income-tax Act 2025, s.159 — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-159-89 (2026)
3. Taxmann, carry-over provisions and s.536 savings clause (8 Jan 2026) — https://www.taxmann.com/post/blog/carry-over-provisions-under-income-tax-act-2025; Taxmann s.9 mapping incl. s.9(10) indirect transfer (1 Sep 2026)
4. Income-tax Act 2025, s.200; domestic company rates — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-200-77; https://incometaxindia.gov.in/Documents/Left%20Menu/TAX%20RATES-domestic.htm (2026)
5. PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries, India — withholding taxes (last reviewed 11 May 2026) — https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/india/corporate/withholding-taxes; Income-tax Act 2025, s.207, as reproduced by EZTax — https://eztax.in/income-tax-act-2025/section-207 (accessed 12 October 2026) and by TaxHeal — https://www.taxheal.com/?p=118624
6. Income-tax Act 2025, s.197 — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-197-78 (2026)
7. Khaitan & Co, Budget 2026 direct tax proposals (2 Feb 2026) — https://www.khaitanco.com/sites/default/files/2026-02/KCO%20-%20Budget%202026-Direct%20Tax%20Proposals%20-%202%20February%202026.pdf; Business Today, buy-back tax (3 Sep 2026) — https://www.businesstoday.in/markets/story/buyback-tax-how-india-changed-the-rules-three-times-in-18-months-and-what-investors-need-to-know-553004-2026-09-03
8. Income Tax Department, Form 41 FAQs — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/documents/d/guest/form-41-faqs (2026)
9. India–UAE DTAA, synthesised text (MLI) — https://incometaxindia.gov.in/DTAA/Synthesized-text-India-UAE-DTAA.htm
10. India–Singapore 2005 Protocol, Notification 185/2005 — https://incometaxindia.gov.in/communications/notification/920110000000001560.htm (18 Jul 2005); K S & K, Singapore grandfathering (6 Apr 2026) — https://ksandk.com/tax/india-singapore-dtaa-capital-gains-grandfathering/
11. India–Netherlands DTAA, synthesised text — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/w/netherlands-synthesised-text-1
12. UK–India synthesised text of the MLI and 1993 Convention — https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/india-tax-treaties/2020-uk-india-synthesised-text-of-the-multilateral-instrument-and-the-1993-double-taxation-convention-in-force
13. India–US Convention (1989) text — https://www.icnl.org/research/library/india_indiatax/
14. KPMG South Africa, Tax Alert Issue 11, India–Mauritius protocol ratification (Aug 2026) — https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmgsites/za/pdf/2026/08/kpmg-tax-alert-issue-11-ratification-of-the-new-protocol-to-the-mauritius-india-tax-treaty-2026.pdf; EY (22 Jul 2026) — https://www.ey.com/en_in/technical/alerts-hub/2026/07/mauritian-cabinet-approves-ratification-of-protocol-to-india-mauritius-dtaa
15. KPMG US, Nestle SA MFN ruling (Oct 2023) — https://kpmg.com/us/en/home/insights/2023/10/tnf-india-notification-required-benefit-under-income-tax-treaty-mfn-clause.html
16. DLA Piper, Supreme Court ruling on Tiger Global, incl. Hareon Solar Singapore v DCIT (Delhi ITAT, 30 Jan 2026) (4 Feb 2026) — https://www.dlapiper.com/insights/publications/2026/02/supreme-court-ruling-on-tiger-global-tax-treaty-eligibility-and-indirect-share-transfers
17. PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries, UAE — income determination (last reviewed 9 Sep 2026) — https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/united-arab-emirates/corporate/income-determination; Deloitte UAE Highlights 2025 — https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-shared/docs/services/tax/2025/dttl-tax-uaehighlights-2025.pdf
18. Deloitte Singapore Highlights 2025 — https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-shared/docs/services/tax/2025/dttl-tax-singaporehighlights-2025.pdf
19. Meijburg & Co, Dutch conditional withholding tax on dividends (2024) — https://meijburg.com/news/withholding-tax-dividends-low-tax-jurisdictions-2024
20. DLA Piper, UAE removed from Dutch low-tax list (31 Jan 2024) — https://www.dlapiper.com/insights/publications/gulf-tax-insights/2024/gulf-tax-insights-january-2024/united-arab-emirates-removed-from-dutch-tax-blacklist-january-2024
21. Pinsent Masons Out-Law, tax issues for UK holding companies (9 Aug 2024) — https://www.pinsentmasons.com/en-gb/out-law/guides/tax-issues-for-uk-holding-companies
22. PKF O'Connor Davies, 2026 international tax planning under OBBBA (2026) — https://www.pkfod.com/insights/2026-international-tax-planning-what-obbba-means-for-us-multinationals/
23. Argus Partners, Tiger Global update (16 Jan 2026) — https://www.argus-p.com/updates/updates/supreme-court-denies-tax-treaty-relief-under-india-mauritius-dtaa-for-tiger-globals-flipkartwalmart-exit/
24. EY, CBDT Circular 1/2025 on the PPT (22 Jan 2025) — https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-in/alerts-hub/2025/01/cbdt-issues-guidance-on-application-of-principal-purpose-test.pdf
25. EY, CBDT amends rules on GAAR grandfathering (2 Apr 2026) — https://www.ey.com/en_in/technical/alerts-hub/2026/03/cbdt-amends-income-tax-rules-to-clarify-gaar-grandfathering-provisions
26. UNCTAD Investment Policy Hub, India: international investment agreements — https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/countries/96/india (accessed 12 October 2026)
27. Herbert Smith Freehills, India terminates BITs (16 Mar 2017) — https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/publicinternationallaw/2017-03/mixed-messages-to-investors-as-india-quietly-terminates-bilateral-investment-treaties-with-58-countries
28. Clifford Chance, latest developments in India BITs (Jul 2025) — https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2025/07/latest-developments-in-india-bit.pdf; Global Arbitration Review, India investment treaty report (2025) — https://globalarbitrationreview.com/insight/know-how/investment-treaty-arbitration/report/india
29. UK Government, business.gov.uk, "The UK–India trade deal" (accessed 11 October 2026) — https://www.business.gov.uk/campaign/alive-with-opportunity/the-uk-india-trade-deal/
30. DPIIT, Press Note 2 (2026 Series) (15 Mar 2026) — https://www.dpiit.gov.in/static/uploads/2026/03/b9da5830b052c2f2d788593e97d07c63.pdf
31. Fox Mandal, FEMA (Non-Debt Instruments) Amendment Rules 2026 (May 2026) — https://foxmandal.in/news/fema-non-debt-instruments-amendment-rules-2026/
32. ATB Legal, UAE CEPA overview — https://atblegal.com/blog/uae-cepa-overview/
33. EY, Delhi Tribunal on intra-group buy-back under India–Netherlands DTAA (Huntsman) (22 Jun 2026) — https://www.ey.com/en_in/technical/alerts-hub/2026/06/delhi-tribunal-ruling-on-whether-share-buy-back-within-corporate-group
34. DPIIT, Standard Operating Procedure for Processing FDI Proposals, Ref. 1/8/2016-F.C.I (4 May 2026), Annexure VII Part II para 7 (accessed 11 October 2026) — https://fifp.gov.in/Forms/SOP.pdf
35. Income-tax Act 2025, s.69 (buy-back of shares), as amended by the Finance Act 2026 — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-69-127 (accessed 12 October 2026)
36. Finance Act 2026 (No. 4 of 2026, assent 30 Mar 2026), s.3(4) and s.3(6) — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/documents/d/guest/finance-act-2026-pdf-1 (accessed 12 October 2026); Taxguru, taxation of buy-back of shares under the Income-tax Act 1961 and Income-tax Act 2025 (27 Jun 2026) — https://taxguru.in/income-tax/taxation-buy-back-shares-income-tax-act-1961-income-tax-act-2025.html
37. Income Tax Department, "Tax Rates — DTAA v. Income-tax Act" — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/w/%E2%80%8Btax-rates-dtaa-v.-income-tax-act (accessed 12 October 2026)
38. Forvis Mazars Mauritius, India–Mauritius DTAA Protocol (11 Sep 2026) — https://www.forvismazars.com/mu/en/services/tax/tax-insights/india-mauritius-dtaa-protocol; Sovereign Group, Mauritius Cabinet approves pending protocol to tax treaty with India (10 Sep 2026) — https://www.sovereigngroup.com/news/mauritius-cabinet-approves-pending-protocol-to-tax-treaty-with-india/; ELP, The India–Mauritius DTAA Protocol and the Principal Purpose Test (Jul 2026) — https://elplaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/The-India-Mauritius-DTAA-Protocol-and-the-Principal-Purpose-Test-Treaty-Entitlement-Substance-and-the-Post-2017-Investment-Landscape.pdf; DPNC, International Tax Update: ratification of the India–Mauritius DTAA (Aug 2026) — https://www.dpncindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/DPNC-International-Tax-Update-Ratification-of-India-Mauritus-DTAA.pdf (all accessed 12 October 2026)
39. Income-tax Act 2025, s.9(10) (indirect transfer) — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-9-1 (accessed 12 October 2026)
40. Income Tax Department, FAQs on forms under the Income-tax Rules 2026 — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/w/faqs-on-forms-as-per-income-tax-rules-2026-1 (accessed 12 October 2026)
41. India–UK BIT (1994), Article 15, WTI EDIT database — https://edit.wti.org/document/show/31ed512e-f760-42c6-a015-273ef2a324c6 (accessed 12 October 2026)
42. India–Netherlands BIT (1995), Article 16(1), WTI EDIT database — https://edit.wti.org/document/show/3abf6f22-022f-4240-b384-cba03d083744 (accessed 12 October 2026)
43. Kluwer Arbitration Blog, "When ambition outpaces architecture: filling the investor-protection vacuum in the India–UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement" (9 Sep 2026) — https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/arbitration-blog/when-ambition-outpaces-architecture-filling-the-investor-protection-vacuum-in-the-india-uk-comprehensive-economic-and-trade-agreement/; NewsBytes, India and UK to restart talks on new investment treaty (9 Sep 2026) — https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/business/india-and-uk-to-restart-talks-on-new-investment-treaty/tldr
44. Khaitan & Co ERGO, amendments to investment from land-bordering nations (5 May 2026) — https://www.khaitanco.com/sites/default/files/2026-05/ERGO_Amendments%20to%20Investment%20from%20Land%20Bordering%20Nations_5%20May%202026.pdf; Mondaq, refining the framework for investments from land-bordering countries: key changes under the 2026 amendment — https://www.mondaq.com/india/money-laundering/1787840/refining-the-framework-for-investments-from-land-bordering-countries-key-changes-under-the-2026-amendment (both accessed 12 October 2026)
45. LiveLaw, Central Government notifies Prevention of Money Laundering (Maintenance of Records) Amendment Rules 2023 (7 Mar 2023) — https://www.livelaw.in/amp/news-updates/central-government-notifies-prevention-of-money-laundering-maintenance-of-records-amendment-rules-2023-223386 (accessed 12 October 2026)
46. Deccan Herald / PTI, India approves just one Chinese FDI proposal in FY26, 13 from Hong Kong (2 Aug 2026) — https://www.deccanherald.com/amp/story/india/india-approves-just-one-chinese-fdi-proposal-worth-rs-1-crore-in-fy26-13-from-hong-kong-4096662; Indian Express, "Govt nod still needed for entities registered in China" (12 Mar 2026), as summarised by VisionIAS — https://dce.visionias.in/upsc-daily-news-summary/article/2026-03-12/the-indian-express/economy/govt-nod-still-needed-for-entities-registered-in-china-dpiit-on-fdi-policy-easing (both accessed 12 October 2026)
47. Income-tax Act 2025, s.147 (IFSC units) — https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-147-91 (accessed 12 October 2026)
48. BDO USA, New tax act changes numerous international tax provisions (21 Jul 2025) — https://www.bdo.com/insights/tax/new-tax-act-changes-numerous-international-tax-provisions (accessed 12 October 2026)
49. RBI, Master Direction — Overseas Investment, para 20(2) — https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/BS_ViewMasDirections.aspx?id=12381 (accessed 12 October 2026)
50. Reserve Bank of India, FBIL reference rates, 12 Oct 2026 — https://www.rbi.org.in/ (accessed 12 October 2026)
51. ATB Legal, India–UK trade deal (CETA) in force: what UK businesses can use now (October 2026) — https://atblegal.com/blog/international-trade/india-uk-trade-deal-ceta/
52. OECD, "Preventing tax treaty abuse" (BEPS Action 6 minimum standard and its implementation through the MLI) — https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/preventing-tax-treaty-abuse.html (accessed 15 October 2026)
53. Deccan Chronicle / PTI, "India–Israel bilateral investment pact comes into force", reporting the Ministry of Finance announcement (4 July 2026) — https://www.deccanchronicle.com/amp/business/india-israel-bilateral-investment-pact-comes-into-force-1968437 (accessed 15 October 2026)
54. IISD Investment Treaty News, "India's revised Model BIT reaches final stages ahead of Cabinet approval" (9 September 2026) — https://www.iisd.org/itn/2026/09/09/indias-revised-model-bit-reaches-final-stages-ahead-of-cabinet-approval/ (accessed 15 October 2026)
55. Supreme Court of India, Authority for Advance Rulings (Income Tax) v Tiger Global International II Holdings, Civil Appeal No. 262 of 2026, 2026 INSC 60 (15 Jan 2026) — https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2025/1251/1251_2025_7_1501_67552_Judgement_15-Jan-2026.pdf
56. Reserve Bank of India, Foreign Exchange Management (Non-debt Instruments) Rules 2019, consolidated text updated to 2 September 2026, Rules 9(1) and 21(2)(c) — https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/bs_viewcontent.aspx?Id=5083 (accessed 15 October 2026)
57. India–United Arab Emirates BIT (2024), Article 36.1 (denial of benefits), WTI EDIT database — https://edit.wti.org/document/show/cc53a87e-1f5e-4225-9ed7-94414f0c4ce1 (accessed 15 October 2026)

Disclaimer: This article is general information, not legal or tax advice. It reflects our understanding of the law and treaty position at 12 October 2026. Verify against current law and take advice on your specific facts before acting.